Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Just because it's the truth

In the Sixties, a so far unknown West German writer named Rolf Hochhuth came to fame with the play "Der Stellvertreter. Ein christliches Trauerspiel" (The Deputy, a Christian Tragedy). It stated that Pius XII had supported Nazi Germany and encouraged Hitler to go ahead with the Holocaust of the Jews of Europe. Since then, Pius XII WAS the man who supported the German Holocaust of the Jews and, somewhat predictably, it didn't make much headlines when it transpired that Hochhuth had been employed by the KGB. I have covered the very topic here and here already. Now I've noticed with great pleasure that Lawrence Auster posted this at VFR:

Setting the record straight on the maligned Pius XII

Much of the Jewish community has tarnished itself in recent years by its support for the demonization of Pope Pius XII by such writers as John Cornwell, author of Hitler's Pope. Gary Krupp writing in the New York Post sets the record straight on the man he calls the friend of the Jews.

Friend to the Jews
By GARY L. KRUPP
December 28, 2009

A recent papal decree moved Pope Pius XII, among others, closer to sainthood--returning to the forefront the controversy over his role in World War II and the Holocaust.

Growing up Jewish in Queens, I never dreamt I would be defending the man I once believed to be a Nazi sympathizer and an anti-Semite. But my work since 2002 with my wife, Meredith, and the Pave the Way Foundation has led me to this point.

We founded Pave the Way to identify and eliminate nontheological obstacles between religions. Thus, despite our early prejudices, we decided to investigate the papacy of Pius XII (Eugenio Pacelli), one of today's greatest sources of hurt between Jews and Catholics.

After years of research in documentary evidence and eyewitness testimony, what we found shocked us. We found nothing but praise and positive news articles concerning Pius' actions from every Jewish, Israeli and political leader of the era who lived through the war.

A few articles in the postwar era suggested that he should have done more to confront the Nazis--but it wasn't until 1963, in the wake of the fictitious play "The Deputy" (written five years after Pius died), that accusations began flowing that he had failed to act, that he was a cold-hearted Nazi sympathizer who couldn't care less about the Jewish people.

The evidence strongly suggests this was part of a KGB-directed and -financed bid to smear Pius, a Soviet disinformation campaign meant to discredit the Catholic Church, which at that time was profoundly anti-Communist.

In any case, the facts simply don't match what so many have come to believe about Pius.

It is unquestionable that Pius XII intervened to save countless Jews at a time most nations--even FDR's America--refused to accept these refugees. He issued false baptismal papers and obtained visas for them to emigrate as "Non Aryan Catholic-Jews." He smuggled Jews into the Americas and Asia. He ordered the lifting of cloister for men and women to enter monasteries, convents and churches to hide 7,000 Jews of Rome in a single day.

Among the 5,000 pages of documents that Pave the Way has located, there is abundant evidence that Pacelli was a lifelong friend of the Jews. Some highlights:

* In 1917, at the request of World Zionist Organization Director Nachum Sokolow, Nuncio Pacelli intervened with the Germans to protect the Jews of Palestine from extermination by the Ottoman Turks.

* In 1925, Pacelli arranged for Sokolow to meet with Pope Benedict XV to discuss a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

* In 1930, Pacelli supported the German bishops' orders excommunicating anyone who joined "the Hitler Party."

* In 1938, Pacelli intervened to defeat a Polish anti-koshering law.

* In 1939, A.W. Klieforth, the US consul general based in Cologne, Germany, wrote a confidential letter to Washington reporting on the "extremeness" of Pacelli's hatred of National Socialism and of Hitler.

* In 1947, at the United Nations, he encouraged the 17 Catholic countries out of the 33 in favor to vote for the partitioning of Palestine to create the State of Israel.

* A 1948 deposition by Gen. Karl Wolff, the SS commandant for Italy, revealed the Nazis' wartime plan to kidnap the pope, kill countless cardinals and seize the Vatican.

But the personal tales may be more compelling. Pacelli's childhood best friend was Guido Mendes, an Orthodox Jewish boy. He tells how Pacel- li shared Shabbat meals with him. Mendes taught him Hebrew, and Pacelli helped him to emigrate to Palestine in 1938.

Pius XII's detractors prefer to criticize rather than simply look at the evidence. Two years ago, Pope Benedict XVI ordered the opening of the Vatican's archives up to 1939, containing much evidence of Eugenio Pacelli's activities leading up to his papacy. According to the sign-in sheets, few of Pius' critics have bothered to come to the archives to view the material.

Pinchas Lapide, a Jewish historian, theologian and Israeli ambassador, stated that the actions and policies of Pius XII saved as many as 860,000 Jews.

Albert Einstein, Golda Meir, the chief rabbi of Palestine, the chief rabbi of Rome and the heads of every Jewish organization showered praise upon him during his lifetime.

Were all these witnesses who lived through the war misguided?

Gary L. Krupp is president of the Pave the Way Foundation, which has many of the documents noted here online at ptwf.org and which will soon publish a book with the main evidence in English, Hebrew, Spanish and French.

This is not about apologetics and it's certainly not history revision, at least not in the sense it is usually applied. It's simply the truth. Will people notice? I doubt it.

Here all entries that mention Pius XII can be found.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Craving for The "Good Muslim"...

... or: The Wearing of The Green

Did any of the hacks who are writing about the riots in Iran really look at the pictures? I mean "look" as in "see what they show"?






Those people are not fighting for Western values, they are, if anything, fighting for the right to twitter.

And did anybody bother to read at least as much as the Wikipedia-entry for the hailed "Grand Ayatollah" Montazeri? I mean "read" as in "understand what it tells"?

That man was anything BUT a "democracy advocate" or "human rights activist".

This is more than just naivity. We are losing our standards. We are craving so much the "good Muslim" with whom we can live in peace that serious journalists (if there is anything like that) and analysists are trying to sell us those riots as a revolt for democracy, just like Katajun Amirpur, one of the obnoxious pet-Persians of the German media, tried to sell us in 2004 in a leading German newspaper the "progress" her native country is undergoing because a 16-year-old girl wasn't going to be be stoned to death, but rather hanged for the crime of pre-marital sex. "(T)he official age of marriage [which is coupled with the age of hangability]... after delicate negotiations between reformers and conservatives, was raised from 9 to 10 years".

Yeah right! Understanding the delicacies of Islam is what really matters.

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Monday, December 21, 2009

No Sharia Law in Gaza, Dhimmi Says

It is often said that the Middle East conflict is not about Islam, but political (as if Islam weren't extremely political) and about land (as if the Arab Palestinians couldn't have had their state decades ago).

Her is an interesting snippet of information that sheds some light on that:

A Dutch journalist visits Gaza. At the border crossing he sees how the border guards throw out beer they've found in one foreign car entering Gaza. Fawzy Barroom ooops... Fawzi Barhoom, Hamas spokesman, explains they need to be consistent. Alcohol is haram and banned in Gaza, and they can't impose that on their own people without also asking foreigners to comply. "We are a moderate Islamic party, but we see to enforcing some important Islamic values. That is our duty."

The reporter's conlusion? Gaza is not an Islamic republic. No Sharia law there.

Thanks to Esther from Islam In Europe!

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Surprise! Reporter from German Public TV Wears Keffiyeh

Yesterday, "Heute", the news from the public German channel ZDF, broadcast at 19:00 h a newsclip from Afghanistan about the Bundeswehr deployment by ZDF-reporter Uli Gack (yes, that's his name!). While interviewing two sergeants it became, fleetingly but clearly enough, visible to the vigilant observer that the reporter wore a keffiyeh. When in full view, he was soberly dressed.

Interestingly, the videoclip was removed from the ZDF website "for legal reasons" a couple of minutes after I started to write this entry, shortly after 17:30h I'd say. I guess they have their reasons.


The keffiyeh, specifically the black and white chicken-wire variety, stands in Germany for anti-Americanism and antisemitism -- ... ooops... make that anti-Zionism -- since the late Sixties. Few Germans may actually know that it was a symbol of Palestinian nationalism, dating back to the Arab revolt in the mid-Thirties of the last century already and that it makes, since then, not just a point against Jewish immigration, but for the killing of Jews as well, but the general idea is doubtlessly understood.

There is a clear communication line across time and political affiliations between Germans and Palestinian Arabs, from the "Grand Mufti of Jerusalem" Haj Amin al-Husseini via today's Palestinians...

... to the German children of their Nazi parents who love to sport the symbol of Jew hatred at Kill-The-Jews-Marches Free Palestine Rallies, together with their Middle Eastern soul mates.

After all this, nobody will be all that much surprised to learn that the "Arafat mop" is worn in right wing extremist circles as well.

Here we have the (then) militant rightwingers Jürgen Gerg and Christian Worch, early in 2003. Gerg is said to have left the right wing extremist scene by crossing the narrow ditch to its leftwing counterpart. He took with him two useful things to help him bond with his new chums: his "anti-imperialist" hatred of America and his keffiyeh.

All that said, maybe the reporter's choice of wardrobe was quite innocent nevertheless, he didn't really know all this and was just sending out signals to the Taliban not to shoot at him. Yes, it must have been that!

Hat tip: Gudrun Eussner!

We thematized the Arafat mop in an earlier blogpost already.

What makes Mawloud Bahr tick?

I haven't blogged for a while for no other reason that I was fed up with the perceived futilily of my blogging efforts, a not entirely new sentiment. But there is always a reason to get over that. What is it this time? I'm afraid I've got to go back and into greater detail to explain:

2009, a new political movement in Germany made moderate headlines. The "Bonner Bündnis für Frieden und Fairness" (Alliance for Peace and Fairness in Bonn) was founded in summer to win in autumn two seats on the city council of Bonn, one for Haluk Yildiz, the BFF president, one for Hülya Dogan, a headscarf-wearing woman. The "Alliance" was represented exclusively by "people with migration background", the politically correct euphemism for Muslims. The dhimmified MSM were absolutely drooling over it, and any campaigning of competing parties (including Pro NRW) was heavily weighed down by BFF's protection because of the German incitement of the people (sedition) legislation.

Hülya Dogan

My friend Gudrun Eussner, who has contributed so much to this blog, had published back then a matter-of-fact article about BFF at her website, including the roster of candidates. I have done so before, but let me say again here, that Gudrun's website contains a wealth of articles, extremely well-written and meticulously researched on many political and cultural issues, including, but not limited to, the threat of Islam to the West. Dr. Gudrun Eussner, now retired, is a political scientist who used to work for international organisations in the Middle East.

Some days ago she got, as a belated reaction to the BFF-article, an email from some Mawloud Bahr, which I have in parts translated. Dear reader, my English hasn't deteriorated, I am just trying to give my translation a whiff of the German I am translating:
We [the author and a friend] are two freedom- and democracy-loving people who are living since childhood here in Germany. I don't have any problem with the fact that you are publicly stating your opinion. ... We are long-standing friends and were enthusiastic about that idea [of a Muslim party] but have, disappointed, retired because of some situations that are predominant there.

We don't have anything to do with that party anymore. Our names aren't on the BFF roster as well anymore as you can see online. But even if I were still with this party I would have massive problems because people like you are publishing reputation-damaging slander abour persons like us two and thus make that we won't find a job anymore, because the bosses are reading at Google about our bad reputation because of you. I can't be bothered having to live at the expense of the German taxpayer from social security because of you.
I would therefore welcome your just step to delete us:
1. Mawloud Bahr
2. Rachide Chamlali
from your website so that we won't appear in the Google search results anymore.
Because we have left the BFF-party we are not public persons like politicians anymore with legally limited privacy but again privare persons. Therefore we reserve our right to file a civil lawsuit against you in the case of a non-deletion from your site because of damage of reputation, slander and compensation for damages because of a non-conclusion of a work contract based on the first two reasons mentioned.
I am sure that we do not have to go so far as to file a lawsuit against you. I have looked into your site in some detail and don't believe that you wish that, apart from the consequences mentioned above, your website will have to be closed down.

Sincerely yours,

Mawloud Bahr
Rachide Chamlali
Gudrun Eussner has, rightfully, not responded to this Stalinist strategy to correct history, and didn't delete the names. Instead, she published the email because she considered it a legitimate counter statement, which was kind of her. Bad luck for the two complainees, though, that some blogs picked it up, for example PI, the German giant of Islam-critique, published it, and gave it a different twist. This blog asks, notabene, the extremely interesting question, whether there isn't a motive quite different from job-hunting behind the wish not to find one's name at Google.

We are proud and happy to join the fray.

What I find most interesting about the entire matter is the fact that the good Mawloud Bahr had had, when he contacted Gudrun Eussner, already almost succeeded to have his name deleted from Google. In fact, Gudrun Eussner's was the only website of importance left. Go figure!

Now it isn't anymore, toughsky shitsky, as the Russian saying goes!

One can't help wondering why a man who claims to has left a Muslim party, engages in exactly the same behaviour we know from the followers of the religion of peace when they don't get their way: whining, complaints, veiled threats, open threats, and all in that order. But then, he didn't specify WHY exactly he was disenchanted with the BFF. Is it possible that they weren't Islamic ENOUGH for him?

Frankly, all this annoys me, as a German, as well. Here we have a man who got a fairly good education as a computer technician (so the BFF roster says) mainly at the expense of the German taxpayer, a man who was either unable or unwilling to acquire halfway decent German language skills, a man who then blames not himself for having foolishly joined a shady political movement, but somebody who has reported about that movement and for his resulting (potential, possible or real) failure to find a job, and on top of all that he has the gall to say that he -- so sorry -- will therefore have to live at the German taxpayer's expense now.

Anyway, if our friend Mawloud Bahr (this one is for the search engines!) indeed HAD an ulterior motive to see his name gone from Google, this shot has backfired and that pleases me no end.

Today, Gudrun has added the information to her article that Mawloud Bahr and Rachide Chamlali both run for the BFF in the election back in October and got votes.

Monday, November 09, 2009

Obama's Choices

Today they celebrate the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the following text is all over the Internet:

President Obama squeezed in a trip to Copenhagen last month to lobby, unsuccessfully, for Chicago to host the 2016 Summer Olympics. He plans to travel to Oslo next month to accept the Nobel Peace Prize, an award that even Obama has said he does not deserve. And this coming week, he sets out on a weeklong tour of Asia.

But the president does not plan to travel to Germany to attend the 20th anniversary celebration Monday of the fall of the Berlin Wall, drawing heated criticism from those who say he's ignoring a shining triumph of American-inspired democracy.
Well yes, he does. Is there any reason to be amazed? Given two alternative choices, this president will always opt for the one that is (more) detrimental to America. Besides, this isn't about HIM HIM HIM and that alone is reason enough for He-Who-Walks-On-Water not to be bothered. At least Sarkozy, despicable little attention whore he is, goes out of his way to lie about his attendance 20 years ago.